Is there anything wrong with a bit of glamour? Is it unrealistic or is it ambitious to reach for that little bit of extra-ness or enhancment that brings us closer to the mental concept of our ideals & our interests . You can glamour things in your life as a way to personally affirm their importance or their significance to you. It is when glamourous powers are used for evil that it becomes malicious ie;
X-Glamour your self Image to gain approval of the masses.
X-Glamour specific details of your resume.
X-Glamour the truth by leaving out MINOR details that hold MAJOR significance..
X-Glamour my $4.95 h&m T with a Fall 2011 Hounds tooth Boston bag embossed with my initials , Spring 2011 Versace pumps, Oliver People Balmain shades, and a Vernus Alma Louis Vuitton turban. . .
Umm well unfortunately that last one I've never quite experienced. Wait not that I've ever been guilty of the previous three either ( ----->Input Glamour Statement here about Beyonce, Paul Mitchell Rabell, & Sachika, being positive examples of glamour as empowerment in order to distract neonfix.blogspot visitors from my self defamation of charchter #POW<------). On that note please read on for the Wikipedia encyclopedia definition of Glamour as a statement. (smh, @Nelleneon Wipes sweat from brows and exhales)
Glamour originally was a magical-occult spell cast on somebody to make them believe that something or somebody was attractive. In the late 19th century terminology a non magical item used to help create a more attractive appearance gradually became 'a glamour'.[1] Today, glamour is the impression of attraction or fascination that a particularly luxurious or elegant appearance creates, an impression which is better than the reality. Typically, a person, event, location, technology, or product such as a piece of clothing can be glamorous or add glamour.Virginia Postrel says that for glamour to be successful nearly always requires sprezzatura - an appearance of effortlessness, and to appear distant - transcending the everyday, to be slightly mysterious and somewhat idealised, but not to the extent it is no longer possible to identify with the person.[1] Glamorous things are neither opaque, hiding all, nor transparent showing everything, but translucent, favourably showing things.[2]The early Hollywood star system in particular specialised in Hollywood glamour where they systematically glamorised their actors and actresses.[1]Glamour can be confused with a style, which is adherence to a particular school of fashion, or intrinsic beauty; whereas glamour can be external and deliberate.
No comments:
Post a Comment